[September 2021-2023] UNBC Bachelor of Education (Elementary) Program Template
 
Reflections on “Inclusion in Education, Literacy and Ableism”

Reflections on “Inclusion in Education, Literacy and Ableism”

            When I went to school in the 1980s and 1990s, seg­re­gat­ed school­ing seemed to be the norm.  Stu­dents who had behav­ioral issues, suf­fered severe learn­ing dif­fi­cul­ties (SLD) or “could not fit into a reg­u­lar class­room” were often seg­re­gat­ed and put into a portable unit and taught out­side the reg­u­lar school com­mu­ni­ty.  The school would some­times inte­grate this “alter­nate class” with oth­er elec­tive class­es such as gym class. Infor­mal­ly, these kids were labeled as “prob­lem” kids as they often came from poor fam­i­lies, or suf­fered from domes­tic vio­lence. In Ter­race, we have Park­side Sec­ondary School, which the school dis­trict web­site labels as an “alter­nate school” (Coast Moun­tains School Dis­trict 82, 2022). This school tries to pro­vide IEPs and sup­port for its stu­dents in an inclu­sive man­ner with­in the school, but I wor­ry that this school is just anoth­er form of seg­re­ga­tion.  I would like to know more of what makes this an “alter­nate school” and if its sup­port poli­cies are so help­ful, then why can they not be applied uni­ver­sal­ly to all schools in the dis­trict? 
            I sus­pect fund­ing is one rea­son. To qual­i­fy for fund­ing, stu­dents need var­i­ous pro­fes­sion­al assess­ments done, and access to this is a lim­it­ing fac­tor.  This is in itself is exclu­sive. It cur­rent­ly takes a min­i­mum of two years when using the pub­licly fund­ed health ser­vices to allow my son access for ASD (autism spec­trum dis­or­der) test­ing.  More­over, once you do get a spot you are expect­ed to make a trip and stay overnight Okana­gan or Van­cou­ver area. Inclu­sion pro­grams that sup­port stu­dents with severe learn­ing dis­abil­i­ties (SLD) are lim­it­ed by fund­ing. In 1994, the “Min­istry tar­get­ed or capped the amount that could be spent from the allo­ca­tion on an edu­ca­tion pro­gram for stu­dents with spe­cial needs” (As cit­ed in BCSC, 2008).  The finan­cial respon­si­bil­i­ty to sup­port all stu­dents with an SLD changed in 2012, when the Supreme Court of Cana­da ruled in Moore v. British Colum­bia that stu­dents are enti­tled to receive the accom­mo­da­tions they need for learn­ing because “spe­cial edu­ca­tion is not a dis­pens­able lux­u­ry” (Inclu­sion BC, 2022).  How­ev­er, the caveat to this rul­ing is that if a stu­dent can­not get access to have an assess­ment done, or if the stu­dent does not meet the strict assess­ment cri­te­ria to be cat­e­go­rized, then the BC Min­istry of Edu­ca­tion (MOE) can evade its respon­si­bil­i­ty of fund­ing equi­table and inclu­sive edu­ca­tion.   In addi­tion, the BC MOE con­tin­ues to use the DSM-IV assess­ment mod­el over the new­ly revised DSM‑V, as switch­ing mod­els would like­ly mean that more stu­dents would meet the SLD cri­te­ria for addi­tion­al spe­cial needs funding.

            Look­ing at Park­side Sec­ondary School, it seems to me the school’s focus is to pri­or­i­tize fos­ter­ing stu­dent behav­ior over stu­dent aca­d­e­m­ic achieve­ment. How­ev­er, we need a bal­ance of both for stu­dent suc­cess.  Authen­tic learn­ing, help­ing to devel­op health and social skills are indeed impor­tant, but we must also ensure stu­dent lit­er­a­cy and numer­a­cy skills reflect the grade lev­els for grad­u­a­tion.  Stu­dents may not want to enter a post-sec­ondary school but they should at least have the foun­da­tion­al skills to allow them to suc­ceed if they choose that option.  We do a dis­ser­vice to them if schools don’t at least pro­vide the pro­fi­cient lit­er­a­cy and numer­a­cy skills need­ed in adult­hood after leav­ing high school.

            In her video, “The Infra­struc­ture of Inclu­sion: Com­post Kate saves the Earth!” Shelly Moore remarks that, “Inclu­sion is a mind­set of growth and move­ment… but also advo­cat­ing for the struc­tures and sup­ports to help us to make the shift” (2018).  That struc­tur­al shift needs to hap­pen sys­tem­i­cal­ly and it starts in our class­room.  So what can we do to make our lessons more inclu­sive?  For me, part of this means help­ing my stu­dents become pro­fi­cient at lit­er­a­cy and numer­a­cy, regard­less of their grade lev­el abil­i­ties.  This means a lot of explic­it instruc­tion to build foun­da­tion­al skills before doing guid­ed dis­cov­ery learn­ing.  Even stu­dent-cen­tered learn­ing requires care­ful plan­ning to ensure stu­dent tasks match their skills and abil­i­ties.  It would be cru­el for some­one with poor fine motor skills to be asked to do fine needle­work with­out assis­tance.  If a per­son does have motor skill issues, then art, using small manip­u­la­tives for math or even writ­ing can become a daunt­ing task.  Find­ing alter­na­tive ways of doing the same task for those stu­dents would like­ly make it eas­i­er for all stu­dents.  Using a tri­pod pen­cil grip, or spe­cial­ly designed tri­an­gu­lar round­ed pen­cils can make writ­ing eas­i­er and it is espe­cial­ly impor­tant to do it right the first time.  Dur­ing a practicum obser­va­tion, I saw a teacher assess her stu­dents’ math skills com­plete­ly oral­ly.  She dic­tat­ed the num­bers and the answers.  I won­dered at the time was the teacher assess­ing the stu­dents’ math skills or their abil­i­ty to com­mu­ni­cate their under­stand­ing of math? I think a mix­ture of skills when teach­ing and assess­ing is need­ed to gauge over­all stu­dent under­stand­ing.  When I want to assess if a stu­dent under­stands the con­cept behind solv­ing a math prob­lem, I should con­sid­er how the stu­dent presents such knowl­edge. Per­haps the stu­dent excels at writ­ing it but has dif­fi­cul­ty oral­ly explain­ing it, or vice-ver­sa.  Either way, to sup­port novice learn­ers, teach­ers will need to mod­el how to do it first.  This means using con­sis­tent and easy to under­stand lan­guage much like when teach­ing ELL (Eng­lish Lan­guage Learn­ers), “Twen­ty and one makes twen­ty-one (20 + 1 = 21).”

            Speak­ing of lan­guage, I reflect­ed on the use of ableist lan­guage. The idea of ableism is that it labels peo­ple by their dis­abil­i­ties and sug­gests that they are some­how infe­ri­or to the non-dis­abled.  Ableist lan­guage con­sists of cer­tain words or phras­es that deval­ue peo­ple who have a dis­abil­i­ty (Hol­land Bloorview, 2018). Alyson Seale (2019) argues soci­ety is pro­mot­ing ableism by using such words in every­day lan­guage.  Lan­guage is an evolv­ing enti­ty and she is cor­rect in that we have the pow­er to change it. How­ev­er, how we inter­pret a word is also a mat­ter of intent, and his­to­ry. The word, “gay” can mean cheer­ful or mer­ry as in “Don we now our gay appar­el” from the Christ­mas car­ol, “Deck the halls.” The way South Park uses it means the slang form of “lame” or “no good.” The adjec­tive, “lame” comes from the Old Eng­lish word lama mean­ing “crip­pled, lame; par­a­lyt­ic, weak” (Online Ety­mol­o­gy Dic­tio­nary, n.d).  When and to what extent are words hurt­ful?  If some­one calls me a “stand up guy” are they insult­ing peo­ple who are wheel­chair bound? The bridge too far for me was when Seale start­ed to crit­i­cize the word “crazy.” Stu­dents need to learn these words, as they are part of our lan­guage.  Online slang uses the word “cray-cray” to mean very crazy.  A word can be offen­sive or inof­fen­sive based on how we inter­pret it.  For Jazz enthu­si­asts in 1927, the word “crazy” meant, “cool, excit­ing.”  The phrase “to dri­ve (some­one) crazy” has been in use since 1873 (Online Ety­mol­o­gy Dic­tio­nary, n.d).  So I will teach my stu­dents all of the words (aside from vul­gar slang as I am cer­tain they will learn those on their own) and remind them that words have pow­er.  Care should be tak­en as to how and when use our words.  Word mean­ing depends on con­text.  We should always be respect­ful, but if we remove all words that make up our diverse lan­guage, then we risk end up talk­ing like Smurfs — where the word “smurf” is sub­sti­tut­ed for what­ev­er noun, verb, adjec­tive, or adverb is being used (Kris­nan­to, 2010).

Ref­er­ences

British Colum­bia Supreme Court (BCSC). (2008). British Colum­bia (Min­istry of Edu­ca­tion) v. Moore, 2008 BCSC 264. 

             Retrieved by https://www.ldac-acta.ca/downloads/pdf/media_release/Judge_Dillon.pdf

Coast Moun­tains School Dis­trict 82. 2022, All schools.
            Retrieved from http://cmsd.bc.ca/all-schools/
Inclu­sion BC (2022). Hand­book on Inclu­sive Edu­ca­tion. Chap­ter 1: His­to­ry, Def­i­n­i­tions and Ben­e­fits of Inclu­sion.
            Retrieved from https://inclusionbc.org/our-resources/inclusive-education-handbook-chapter‑1/#3
Kris­nan­to. B. (2010). The intend­ed mean­ing of Smurf words in Smurf com­ic strips.

            Retrieved by https://repository.usd.ac.id/26296/2/044214016_Full%5B1%5D.pdf
Hol­land Bloorview Kids Reha­bil­i­ta­tion Hos­pi­tal. (2018). How to avoid using ableist lan­guage.
            Retrieved http://deareverybody.hollandbloorview.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/DearEverybodyTipsonAbleistLanguage2018-19.pdf

 Moore, S. (Oct. 2018). The Evo­lu­tion of Inclu­sion: The past and future of edu­ca­tion. YouTube.

            Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQgXBhPh5Zo

Online Ety­mol­o­gy Dic­tio­nary. (n.d) Online Ety­mol­o­gy Dic­tio­nary. Web­site.
            Retrieved from https://www.etymonline.com/word/lame.