The following reflection post was for a Pro‑D web-seminar assigned for UNBC’s EDUC 397, Humanities K‑7 (2022 Spring Intersession Semester) — June 6th, 2022
Developing Phonological Awareness by Focusing on Phonemic Awareness
During our intensive week of studies at UNBC in Prince George, we discussed the 5 Pillars of Reading Development, which are based on the Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching Children to Read (NICHD and U.S. Dept. of Education, 2000). The first pillar is about supporting phonological awareness. In the CORE webinar, “Rethinking Instruction in Phonological Awareness: Focus on What Matters!” Dr. Susan Brady breaks down the first phonological awareness pillar into two categories: phonological sensitivity and phoneme awareness (Brady, 2022). She suggests that elementary teachers focus on developing children’s phonemic awareness (PA) instead of prioritizing phonological sensitivity, as the Reading Panel meta-research shows that PA is more effective at building literacy.
It is important to note that Brady is not asking educators to completely ignore building children’s phonological sensitivity, but rather she wants us to de-emphasize that part of the phonological awareness umbrella. These phonological sensitivity skills include understanding onset-rime, syllabic knowledge, rhyme and alliteration and are the building blocks for music, poetry, (knock-knock) jokes, and wordplay games. Reducing the focus on these skills to better support literacy might be challenging for teachers as such activities are the least complex to do and children often have fun doing them. Brady recalls how her colleague and the creator of the LiPS Program (Lindamood-Bell Learning Processes, n.d), Pat Lindamood, lamented on doing rhyme activities in class because:
“if the kids don’t have good phonological skills and you teach them rhyme, then
they just get stuck on rhyme. And you are trying to redirect them to something
else, and they just go to their default of coming up with a rhyme. (As cited in Brady, 2021)
The Reading Panel Report mentions that despite a lack of research confirming the effects of student engagement and of teacher motivation when teaching PA, it seems “self-evident that teachers will be most effective when they are enthusiastic in their teaching and enjoy what they are doing in the classroom” (NICHD and U.S. Dept. of Education, 2000, p.2–7). I would agree, and so I challenge myself to find a way to teach PA in a relevant and playful manner to fully engage my students in their learning.
I propose making educational games and enjoyable activities to support learning PA. Brady mentions that teaching PA primarily orally can be unfair and taxing on children’s phonological working memory. I think that digital games can help alleviate this while also boosting student engagement, as they provide a quick, visual and interactive way to practice PA. The Reading Panel Report recommends that, “Classroom teachers as well as computers can teach PA effectively” (NICHD and U.S. Dept. of Education, 2000). I think using technology to foster PA is a great idea, as it could be used to let students practice independently for short bursts of time in daily learning stations, or during “Daily Five” activities. The software itself could track individual student progress, and provide additional explicit instruction to students who need it. If designed and implemented well, such technology has the potential to support equitable learning for students with special needs. Learners new to the English language, students with ADHD, or students who are gifted, could each have customized lessons to support differentiated instruction. Students could even practice PA at home, if the school provides them access to such technology.
It is understandable to practice all aspects of phonological awareness to foster language comprehension and word recognition, as they are a necessary part of skilled reading (Scarborough, 2001). However, as Brady suggests, phoneme awareness skills (phonemic awareness, phoneme isolation, identity, categorization, blending, segmentation, and deletion) need to be learned first and prioritized over practicing phonological sensitivity skills. Educators must endeavor to make this learning process as engaging as possible for students. Before I graduate as a certified teacher, I intend to research, design and share with my peers, any educational activities or games that can aid in building phoneme awareness for our students.
References
Brady, S. (2022). Rethinking Instruction in Phonological Awareness: Focus on What Matters!
CORE Inc. Retrieved from https://www.corelearn.com/resource-posts/webinar-rethinking-instruction-in-phonological-awareness/
Lindamood-Bell Learning Processes. (n.d) Lindamood Phoneme Sequencing® Program for Reading, Spelling, and Speech (LiPS®).
Retrieved from https://lindamoodbell.com/program/lindamood-phoneme-sequencing-program
Scarborough, H. (2001). Scarborough’s reading rope.
Retrieved from https://www.reallygreatreading.com/content/scarboroughs-reading-rope
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) and U.S. Dept. of Education. (2000).
Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching Children to Read.
Retrieved by https://www.readingrockets.org/sites/default/files/NRP-2000.pdf